Main section
-
Top story
Alastair Campbell's 'unprecedented' role in preparing dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
Nicholas Jones
DATELINE: 13/1/10
Despite denying repeatedly that he played a 'sexing up game' when working on the government's much-criticised dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, Alastair Campbell acknowledged in his evidence to the Chilcot Inquiry (12.1.2010) that his role had been unprecedented. Never before had a party political spin doctor chaired meetings of Britain's intelligence chiefs nor had a Downing Street press secretary previously had access to secret intelligence information which he did not require to see on a 'need to know' basis.
Cameron justified the exceptional degree of influence which he had exercised over the presentation of the dossier on the grounds that Tony Blair was having to come to terms with the rapidly changing nature of the news media and the growth of twenty four hour news.
Blair wanted Campbell to ensure that a 'communications strategy' was embedded in the presentation of the government's case against Saddam Hussein and that led to the unprecedented decision in September 2002 to publish a dossier on intelligence information about weapons of mass destruction.
Campbell wrote the first draft to the forward of the dossier which said the intelligence had assessed 'beyond doubt' that Saddam Hussein continued to produce chemical and biological weapons and a nuclear capability.
It was put to Campbell by Inquiry member Baroness Usha Prashar that the innovation of publishing a dossier had 'blurred the lines' of constitutional propriety because intelligence material should have been kept separate from decision making process and the presentation of government policy on Iraq.
Campbell justified the dossier on the grounds that intelligence information had to become more involved in public communication. It was a response to the changing media landscape and the fact that the public and the media would not accept simply the word of the Prime Minister.
'I think the process was rigorous...the integrity was strong and profound and we are only having this discussion because of the subsequent controversy over an utterly dishonest piece of journalism'. (A reference to Andrew Gilligan's report for the BBC that Campbell had 'sexed up' the dossier).
Earlier in response to questions from Sir Roderic Lyne, Campbell accepted that his role chairing Downing Street meetings with intelligence chiefs and having access to secret intelligence information which the Downing Street press secretary did not require to see on a 'need to know' basis was unprecedented.
Campbell said the publication of the dossier was a response to changed media culture. When he was a journalist (on the Daily Mirror) and the government said it did not comment on intelligence matters, journalists tended to accept the position; that approach was no longer tenable.
'The dossier was an exercise in openness, in trying to share with the public information which is sensitive; so that the public could be informed...that was the thinking behind it.'
John Scarlett, the chairman of the joint intelligence committee, who had 'ownership' of the dossier, asked Campbell for presentational support and advice. 'I was chairing the meetings because the Prime Minister would be presenting the paper to parliament, there would be massive media interest around the world and it was absolutely necessary I should have done that. I was the person who was charged by the Prime Minister to advise on all presentational aspects of the dossier'.Campbell denied that he had been part of a 'sexing up game' to strengthen the dossier. At no point did he seek to over-ride, over-write or sex up the intelligence. 'I was being accused of distorting the intelligence, forcing intelligence officials to do things which they don't want to do; that is untrue...I defend every single word of the dossier and every single part of the process. I think it was a genuine attempt by the Prime Minster and the government to engage the public properly in understanding his concerns about the growing threat posed by Saddam Hussein'.
When challenged by Sir Roderic Lyne over why the Prime Minister's foreword had used the words established 'beyond doubt' about weapons of mass destruction, Campbell denied that parliament had been misled: 'I do stand by the words 'beyond doubt'...that was the judgement the Prime Minister was led to make by the intelligence information'.
Although Baroness Prashar did suggest that the dossier had 'blurred the lines' over the need to keep intelligence information away from the presentation of government decision making, Campbell was not probed any further about the subsequent changes made by Blair's successor Gordon Brown who in 2007 decreed that party political spin doctors should no longer play any part in the preparation of intelligence information which might be presented to the public.Campbell's final plea to the inquiry was that he hoped governments did not revert to the 'old fashioned communications' mindset which ignored the impact of both twenty four hour news and embedded news which allowed the media to give 'a snap shot here, a snap shot there'. Governments should not forget it is their role to 'show the big picture'. His parting shot was a classic Campbell riposte: 'The integrity and professionalism of the dossier I would defend to the end of my days'.
Nicholas Jones 12.1.2010
Last modified: Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Your comments:
» Click here to add your comment.
Comments will be subject to approval and should not be defamatory, obscene, racist, in breach of copyright, or contrary to law. The CPBF is not reponsible for any views expressed here.
Previous government policy stories
CPBF submission to DCMS consultation on product placement on television
Action on product placement
Scottish parliament inquiry into local newspaper decline
Straw to look at libel law reform
Response to Digital Britain
Simon will look at safeguards on product placement
Campaign opposes U-turn on product placement
Government to reverse policy on TV product placement
Damian McBride and the reality behind Labour smears
Little comfort for journalists in Digital Britain
"I will abide by civil service neutrality" says Downing Street's new spin supremo.
Speaker's call for an end to ministerial leaks: Downing Street's new media chief could play a role
Photographers snap into action over new law
Audiovisual Media Services Directive in the UK
Televised briefings are the way forward
Media gagged in the case of Daniel James
Does convergence matter?
Civil servant faces official secrets trial
New Threat to Media Freedom
Blair's farewell: No politician can live by spin alone
Government response to Public Voice Petition on Digital Dividend
New Media services should not be regulated like TV, says Lords Committee
IFJ Alarmed by Western Attacks on Whistleblowers and Investigative Journalism
Current Affairs and Ofcom
From The Files
Minister backs BBC Arabic TV
Terror Bill 'a threat to press freedom' says CPBF
Inquiry into new media and the creative industries
OFT and Magazine Distribution
Sewn Up: Media Policy Excludes Public
-
Notices
Events & Announcements
Fringe meeting at the TUC
DATELINE: 26/8/10Tuesday 14 September 6.00pm – 8.00pm Mayor’s Parlour, Manchester Town Hall, M2 5DB
‘Media for All – the Democratic Challenge’.
An open event hosted by Making Good Society and the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom (CPBF), supported by the Carnegie UK Trust.
DOWNLOAD FREEPRESS NOW
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Download PDFs of Freepress here.
MEDIA FOR ALL CONFERENCE 09
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Media for All Conference 09
Conference Papers
-
Previous stories
Government Policy
CPBF submission to DCMS consultation on product placement on television
Action on product placement
Scottish parliament inquiry into local newspaper decline
Straw to look at libel law reform
Response to Digital Britain
Simon will look at safeguards on product placement
Campaign opposes U-turn on product placement
Government to reverse policy on TV product placement
Damian McBride and the reality behind Labour smears
Little comfort for journalists in Digital Britain
"I will abide by civil service neutrality" says Downing Street's new spin supremo.
Speaker's call for an end to ministerial leaks: Downing Street's new media chief could play a role
Photographers snap into action over new law
Audiovisual Media Services Directive in the UK
Televised briefings are the way forward
Media gagged in the case of Daniel James
Does convergence matter?
Civil servant faces official secrets trial
New Threat to Media Freedom
Blair's farewell: No politician can live by spin alone
Government response to Public Voice Petition on Digital Dividend
New Media services should not be regulated like TV, says Lords Committee
IFJ Alarmed by Western Attacks on Whistleblowers and Investigative Journalism
Current Affairs and Ofcom
From The Files
Minister backs BBC Arabic TV
Terror Bill 'a threat to press freedom' says CPBF
Inquiry into new media and the creative industries
OFT and Magazine Distribution
Sewn Up: Media Policy Excludes Public