Main section
-
Top story
Rules on stop and search changed
BBC News website
DATELINE: 8/7/10
Stricter tests for stop and search powers have been announced by the home secretary after being ruled unlawful by the European Court of Human Rights. Police will now not be allowed to use the powers unless they "reasonably suspect" a person of being a terrorist.
The court ruled on the power to search without suspicion under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 last month.Human rights campaigners Liberty said it had "criminalised and alienated more people than it ever protected".
The ruling followed a case brought by two people who had been stopped by police near an arms fair in London in 2003.
In a Commons statement, Home Secretary Theresa May said: "The first duty of government is to protect the public but that duty must never be used as a reason to ride roughshod over our civil liberties."
She said the European Court's judgement had found the use of Section 44 amounted to "the violation of the right to a private life".
The court found the powers were "drawn too broadly at the time of their initial authorisation and when they are used" and lacked sufficient safeguards to protect civil liberties.
Mrs May said: "The government cannot appeal this judgement, although we would not have done so had we been able.
"We have always been clear in our concerns about these powers and they will be included as part of our review of counter-terrorism legislation."
She said after taking legal advice and consulting with police forces, the use of Section 44 powers will now be restricted to searching vehicles.
Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, said the lobby group had argued against the power for 10 years. "It is a blanket and secretive power that has been used against school kids, journalists, peace protesters and a disproportionate number of young black men. "To our knowledge, it has never helped catch a single terrorist. This is a very important day for personal privacy, protest rights and race equality in Britain."
Lord Carlile, the government's independent reviewer of anti-terror legislation, said Section 44 had been ineffective in combating terrorism, had caused community tensions and was used "arbitrarily and for incorrect purposes".
"Section 44 has given a lot of trouble and, in any event, it's now illegal," he told BBC Radio 4's The World At One. "You don't have to search people to discourage terrorists, the evident availability of police officers in the area, obvious uniformed policing, is just as much of a deterrent."
Shadow home secretary Alan Johnson said the court's judgment was based on the way the powers were used "some years ago". "The number of stop and searches under Section 44 has reduced considerably over the last two years," he said. He said the decision would restrict the powers of the police.
The case that prompted the change was brought by Kevin Gillan and Pennie Quinton, who were both stopped outside the Defence Systems and Equipment International exhibition, at the Excel Centre in London Docklands, in 2003, where there had already been protests and demonstrations.
Student Mr Gillan was detained as he was cycling to join the demonstration, while Ms Quinton, a journalist, was in the area to film the protests.
Both the High Court and the Court of Appeal rejected their claim that such tactics were illegal, ruling that stop-and-search was legitimate given the threat of terrorism in London. However, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) disagreed, and declared it an unlawful violation of an individual's right to privacy and family life.
Last modified: Thursday, July 8, 2010
Your comments:
» Click here to add your comment.
Comments will be subject to approval and should not be defamatory, obscene, racist, in breach of copyright, or contrary to law. The CPBF is not reponsible for any views expressed here.
Previous government policy stories
2010 general election: game changer for politics...and media
Rules tightened for council-funded newspapers
Media policies after the election
What are Jeremy Hunt's priorities as the new culture secretary?
MPs pass Digital Economy Bill
MEDIA MANIFESTO 2010
Jack Straw unveils plan to curb libel tourism
Straw acts on libel fees
Government announcement on Television Product Placement
Libel laws group announced
Alastair Campbell's 'unprecedented' role in preparing dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
CPBF submission to DCMS consultation on product placement on television
Action on product placement
Scottish parliament inquiry into local newspaper decline
Straw to look at libel law reform
Response to Digital Britain
Simon will look at safeguards on product placement
Campaign opposes U-turn on product placement
Government to reverse policy on TV product placement
Damian McBride and the reality behind Labour smears
Little comfort for journalists in Digital Britain
"I will abide by civil service neutrality" says Downing Street's new spin supremo.
Speaker's call for an end to ministerial leaks: Downing Street's new media chief could play a role
Photographers snap into action over new law
Audiovisual Media Services Directive in the UK
Televised briefings are the way forward
Media gagged in the case of Daniel James
Does convergence matter?
Civil servant faces official secrets trial
New Threat to Media Freedom
-
Notices
Events & Announcements
Fringe meeting at the TUC
DATELINE: 26/8/10Tuesday 14 September 6.00pm – 8.00pm Mayor’s Parlour, Manchester Town Hall, M2 5DB
‘Media for All – the Democratic Challenge’.
An open event hosted by Making Good Society and the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom (CPBF), supported by the Carnegie UK Trust.
DOWNLOAD FREEPRESS NOW
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Download PDFs of Freepress here.
MEDIA FOR ALL CONFERENCE 09
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Media for All Conference 09
Conference Papers
-
Previous stories
Government Policy
2010 general election: game changer for politics...and media
Rules tightened for council-funded newspapers
Media policies after the election
What are Jeremy Hunt's priorities as the new culture secretary?
MPs pass Digital Economy Bill
MEDIA MANIFESTO 2010
Jack Straw unveils plan to curb libel tourism
Straw acts on libel fees
Government announcement on Television Product Placement
Libel laws group announced
Alastair Campbell's 'unprecedented' role in preparing dossier on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction
CPBF submission to DCMS consultation on product placement on television
Action on product placement
Scottish parliament inquiry into local newspaper decline
Straw to look at libel law reform
Response to Digital Britain
Simon will look at safeguards on product placement
Campaign opposes U-turn on product placement
Government to reverse policy on TV product placement
Damian McBride and the reality behind Labour smears
Little comfort for journalists in Digital Britain
"I will abide by civil service neutrality" says Downing Street's new spin supremo.
Speaker's call for an end to ministerial leaks: Downing Street's new media chief could play a role
Photographers snap into action over new law
Audiovisual Media Services Directive in the UK
Televised briefings are the way forward
Media gagged in the case of Daniel James
Does convergence matter?
Civil servant faces official secrets trial
New Threat to Media Freedom