Main section
-
Top story
Fears for Bradley Manning after Wikileaks 'dump'
Jack Bremer First Post
DATELINE: 27/7/10
What happens now to the US soldier who - it is widely assumed - supplied the Wikileaks material? As journalists at the Guardian and the New York Times will attest after spending three weeks going through the material, the unloading of US secret military documents via Wikileaks was more of a "dump" than a "leak". A staggering 90,000 documents were given to Wikileaks and passed on to the two newspapers and the German magazine Der Spiegel in an effort to give the material maximum exposure.
Many of the details were already known and have been reported by correspondents in Afghanistan: the use of special forces 'black ops' teams to take out specific insurgent leaders, the Taliban's use of ground-to-air missiles against Nato forces, and the suspicion that Pakistan's military intelligence agency, the ISI, was working against Nato interests to support the insurgents.
It's the sheer mass of the documentation that is impressive. "It's quantity not quality," said Robert Fox, who writes on military and security matters for The First Post. "Almost all the detail was already known by journalists. There appears to be no silver bullet - no devastating fact of which we were all unaware." That said, the leak has exposed a higher level of civilian casualties than has been reported, both as result of Nato missions going wrong and because of the growing use of roadside bombs by the Taliban.
Incidents of erroneous Nato attacks on civilians - termed 'blue on white' in military speak - revealed in the leaked documents include French troops strafing a bus full of children in 2008, a US patrol machine-gunning a bus, and Polish troops mortaring a village in an apparent revenge attack. Members of a wedding party, including a pregnant woman, were killed in the Polish attack.
The leak is a shocking breach of security and neither the Pentagon nor the White House are going to take it lying down. Which raises fears among journalists and anti-war campaigners for Bradley Manning, the young US Army intelligence analyst who is believed to be the source of the leak. What price will he now pay for his alleged crime?
There seems little doubt that Manning is the source. He is already in military custody in Kuwait accused of leaking the Wikileaks 'Collateral Murder' video of an Apache helicopter crew gunning down innocent civilians in Baghdad in 2007.
As readers of The First Post will recall, Manning was shopped to his superiors by a former computer hacker, Adrian Lamo, to whom Manning had confessed his role in the course of an extended email conversation in May. Lamo has argued that he felt bound to tell the US military about Manning precisely because the soldier warned him that he had also leaked tens of thousands of confidential diplomatic cables to Wikileaks - the very material now exposed and promoted by the Guardian, the New York Times and Der Spiegel.
"Hillary Clinton, and several thousand diplomats around the world, are going to have a heart attack when they wake up one morning, and find an entire repository of classified foreign policy is available, in searchable format, to the public," Manning is said to have told Lamo.
Lamo said he informed the military because he feared the leak endangered American security. But have Wikileaks, and its controversial Australian founder Julian Assange (pictured left), now exposed Manning to much harsher treatment than he might have received for the 'Collateral Murder' leak alone? Lamo thinks so. He told the Daily Beast website: "For WikiLeaks to do this, it's transparently callous in its attitude toward him [Manning]. The information wasn't going to go away. WikiLeaks could have waited until after Manning was sentenced, after he was tried." Lamo went on: "WikiLeaks is just paying lip service to wanting to protect Manning as a potential source, while letting him get hit by a train over this."
He also questions whether Manning acted alone in leaking the material. "It was not my impression that he had the technological expertise to carry out some of these actions. I believe that somebody would have had to have been of assistance to him."
Of course, Lamo could be accused of trying to pass the blame to Wikileaks - it was he, after all, who shopped Manning. "I feel an attachment to this kid," he told the Daily Beast, "even though he probably hates my guts now."
http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/66322,news-comment,news-politics,fears-for-bradley-manning-after-wikileaks-dump-afghanistan-special-forces-nato
LAST UPDATED 3:45 PM, 26 July, 2010.Last modified: Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Your comments:
» Click here to add your comment.
Comments will be subject to approval and should not be defamatory, obscene, racist, in breach of copyright, or contrary to law. The CPBF is not reponsible for any views expressed here.
Previous war reporting stories
IFJ mourns latest media death in Afghanistan
Media Workers Against the War - tonight's meeting cancelled
Gaza appeal & the BBC licence fee - we should still pay, but keep up the pressure
CPBF protests over BBC ban
Gaza appeal and the BBC : act now
IFJ praises courageous journalists as mission enters Gaza
IFJ to investigate violations after new assault on Gaza media
Another Gaza journalist killed, IFJ calls for global protest over media blockade
IFJ slams Israel over targeting and
Georgia and the PR war
Revealed: war propaganda in the British media
Beyond the Green Zone: Dispatches from an unembedded journalist in occupied Iraq
Iraq 5 years on: How the media sells war and why
Media workers challenge war
Journalists to debate concerns over war coverage
Alan's thanks
Consistently biased
Hostage for 100 days
Media independence during Iraq war questioned
Journalists' Coverage of Middle East Shallow and Distorted
NUJ welcomes release of kidnapped photographer
Murdoch has no regrets over Iraq
'Bomb Al-jazeera', Blunkett said
Book Review: 'The Origins and Organisation of British Propaganda in Ireland 1920'
Don't Attack Iran
Media workers against the war - meeting
Rumsfeld's assault on free speech
Unworthy Victims?
World journalists condemn “stooge journalism”
MPs raise questions on Aljazeera-gate
-
Notices
Events & Announcements
Fringe meeting at the TUC
DATELINE: 26/8/10Tuesday 14 September 6.00pm – 8.00pm Mayor’s Parlour, Manchester Town Hall, M2 5DB
‘Media for All – the Democratic Challenge’.
An open event hosted by Making Good Society and the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom (CPBF), supported by the Carnegie UK Trust.
DOWNLOAD FREEPRESS NOW
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Download PDFs of Freepress here.
MEDIA FOR ALL CONFERENCE 09
DATELINE: 26/3/10
Media for All Conference 09
Conference Papers
-
Previous stories
War Reporting
IFJ mourns latest media death in Afghanistan
Media Workers Against the War - tonight's meeting cancelled
Gaza appeal & the BBC licence fee - we should still pay, but keep up the pressure
CPBF protests over BBC ban
Gaza appeal and the BBC : act now
IFJ praises courageous journalists as mission enters Gaza
IFJ to investigate violations after new assault on Gaza media
Another Gaza journalist killed, IFJ calls for global protest over media blockade
IFJ slams Israel over targeting and
Georgia and the PR war
Revealed: war propaganda in the British media
Beyond the Green Zone: Dispatches from an unembedded journalist in occupied Iraq
Iraq 5 years on: How the media sells war and why
Media workers challenge war
Journalists to debate concerns over war coverage
Alan's thanks
Consistently biased
Hostage for 100 days
Media independence during Iraq war questioned
Journalists' Coverage of Middle East Shallow and Distorted
NUJ welcomes release of kidnapped photographer
Murdoch has no regrets over Iraq
'Bomb Al-jazeera', Blunkett said
Book Review: 'The Origins and Organisation of British Propaganda in Ireland 1920'
Don't Attack Iran
Media workers against the war - meeting
Rumsfeld's assault on free speech
Unworthy Victims?
World journalists condemn “stooge journalism”
MPs raise questions on Aljazeera-gate